Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics of Gatineau Park: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Racepacket (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 106:
::::::Racepacket: Far as I know, none of what I contributed to wikipedia was published elsewhere. I don't think your point applies here. And I'm still stymied about what Ahunt and MilborneOne mean by copyright violation. I can't see any such violation, and it is incumbent on them to explain/demonstrate/prove their accusation or to withdraw it. --[[User:Stoneacres|Stoneacres]] ([[User talk:Stoneacres|talk]]) 14:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
:::::::I did not mean to imply that there was a copyright problem. I have not tried to compare this article against other online literature, and accept your word that it is all original. [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 03:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Or if page is merged into Gatineau Park it should contain much of what is presented in the Politics of Gatineau Park section. As well, at least some of the pictures should be kept. They provide factual, unbiased information you won't get from the NCC.
--[[Special:Contributions/99.246.2.69|99.246.2.69]] ([[User talk:99.246.2.69|talk]]) 11:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
| |||