Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The glenn robinsons
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The glenn robinsons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable one-man-band. Does not pass WP:BAND. Warrah (talk) 14:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I accidently made a duplicate nomination. My rationale was as follows: This band doesn't seem to meet the general notability guideline, nor the specific guidelines in WP:MUSIC. Because the band has 4 full length albums out, I think some more discussion than given in a PROD is warrented. The album "The most worst thing ever" (a comilation album) was released on Wreck Kidz Lbl. That doesn't seem to be an important indie label as meant in WP:MUSIC #5. ( "an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable" emph. mine). I haven't been able to find out what label the other albums were released under. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I can find no coverage for this band. Does not appear to meet any of the WP:BAND criteria. Gongshow Talk 16:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as I am unable to find significant coverage for this band. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 22:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Per A7. --Fbifriday (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 19:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:BAND. At least has some claims to notability, so I don't think you could quite have gotten away with an A7, Lord Spongefrog, (Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!) 20:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; no evidence of notability. Note also the albums Mechanical Bullfighter and Bear Attack, which will have to be deleted with it — they don't require separate discussions, as they'll automatically become CSD A9s if the band's article goes. Bearcat (talk) 23:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.