Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theo Peppers
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Theo Peppers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotion from a shill. Not notable. Awards are not major. Lacks coverage about him in multiple independent reliable sources. Meeting Paris is primary. Exposed vocals is a pay for play promotion platform. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Musicians are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist — they must be reliably sourceable as actually passing one or more WP:NMUSIC criteria. But nothing claimed herein passes NMUSIC at all, and virtually all of the sourcing is to primary sources or blogs, which are not sources that can assist in showing notability. Note also the redirect from Theofanis Tsanas, which will have to be deleted as well. Bearcat (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass our notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.